You know, sometimes I get tired of writing these. I mean, I know my legion of screaming fans - both of you - would commit violent gory suicide with chainsaws and the business ends of automotive engines if I ever stopped, but there are days when I ask myself what the frick'n point is, anyway. This is a dangerous question for a Buddhist to ask about anything because, of course, there is no point. To anything. Ever. And once you start thinking about that, it's only a short period of time until a miniature black hole takes root in your brain and your entire head starts to slowly implode, kind of like the planet Vulcan did in the first Star Trek movie but without the great f/x. And we all know how that ended.
(Okay, I admit I have no idea how that ended. That movie confused the living sheep out of me. Was Leonard Nimoy supposed to be the "old" Spock from our timeline, and Zachary Quinto was the "new" Spock because he hadn't passed through the space/time paradox, or what the hell was going on, on that ice planet? I kept expecting a guy in a blue box to materialize and explain the whole thing in a British accent, and then somebody named Luke to get into a fight with an abominable snowman. No, don't tell me anything about the new Star Trek yet. I haven't seen it. Hopefully this weekend.)
The irony is that I always have time for it. Thursday, six o'clock, me, laptop, Afrah. In between gobbling pita bread and guzzling lemonade (except during Ramadan, and July 8 through August 7, thanks for asking), I knock out sentences like I do it for a living. Which I do, kind of. Most of them start out like "COMES NOW GUS GOODGUY, Plaintiff, and complains of WILL WEASEL, Defendant, and for this his Original Petition will state as follows..." I also write in the morning before work. Two to three pages of whatever junk is knocking around in my head, and it's generally a lot of paranoid delusional self pitying sissypants crap. What I don't seem to have time for, and this is really weird considering who's saying it, is actual, you know, writing.
I am working on a novel, you know. (Or maybe you didn't. Okay, I'm working on a novel. Now you know.) I'm only about 30 pages in, but that's 30 pages that didn't exist before. What's ironic, though, is that totally unlike Mindbender and her two older sisters, this one is, uh, actually hard. As in, it's not just flowing out of my fingers like so much, uh--what flows out of fingers? I guess nothing, unless you chop off the ends. So let's just drop that simile like a lead balloon and move on. What I mean is it doesn't soar. It just plods along, and I sometimes feel like I'm breaking rocks on the freeway just to knock out the requisite ten pages for the next meeting of my writer's group. (Did I mention I'm in a new writer's group? I'm in a new writer's group. Now you know.)
I avoid working on it. I tweet. I flip through Alternet and Huffington Post and RawStory and RHRealityCheck and lots of other Web sites filled with great stories about this great country and the great people in it, and how the rich are greatly helpful to the poor and the poor have a great chance of becoming rich, and everybody respects everybody else's civil rights and it's all just great. Then I mess with my cell phone, play a few rounds of Words With Total Strangers, say a few things on Disqus that I'm bound to regret in the morning and move the word "plant" up and down and all over the screen for no apparent reason. Maybe I get a sentence or two in there. I'm likely to erase the sentence ten minutes after I typed it and start over again.
Is it writer's block? No. I don't believe in writer's block, and I didn't believe in it when I was unmedicated and writing in 18-hour overnight binges of 70 pages at a stretch. Man, I miss those days sometimes. (Joan doesn't, though.)
What I think it is, is the Curse of the Dryer Lint.
See, Mindbender is a very dark trilogy. There's a dangerous assassin and an international criminal and a psychotic would-be general and a petrified accountant and a lot of other Really Bad People in it. Some of these Bad People do Very Bad Things. Some of the Good People, for that matter, get pushed into situations where they, too, have to do Very Bad Things. (The insane mother, for example, jumps the corrupt detective in a hospital corridor and kills him by injecting drain cleaner into his carotid artery. He expires in less than seven seconds. I was particularly proud of that one.) And maybe because there was all this darkness tumbling around in my head like clothes in a dryer, I started to build up dryer lint that could only be cleaned off the screen if I wrote something completely ridiculous.
So I did. And it was fun.
And I'm trying to do it again, here, and it's not fun at all. The only thing I can see I'm doing different now is not writing something very dark at the same time.
So maybe I need to start something dark. Or go back to something dark that I was working on but quit working on because it was too dark.
Which reminds me, I have a meeting to get to. I can tell because it's getting dark.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
A Thousand Stars in the Night Sky
Stars.Oh, yeah, I went to this Buddhist retreat, and there was a lot of meditating and a lot of Noble Silence, and it was a great time all the way around, but what I remember most are the stars.
I live in Dallas. It's a fine place to live, but there's so much light here. It's humid and light bounces off the water in the air and at nine at night it can look like twilight. If you see a star, it's either really bright or it's a comet that's burst through the outer stratosphere and is plummeting toward Earth, due to explode a thousand feet up and take out thousands of trees in a repeat of Tunguska that practically screams you'll be late for work tomorrow, er, if you're not dead.
But this place. Oh my God.
We were eighty miles out of Dallas. We could see it, glowing on the horizon like a nuclear plant with serious problems, but it was far away. Standing out in a field on the prairie just a mile or so from the Red River, we looked up and saw stars. Hundreds and thousands of stars.
"There's a thousand stars in the night sky, I wonder which one could be yours." --Big Country, "The Broken Promise Land"
It takes a human eyeball about forty minutes to fully acclimate to the darkness. I spent the forty minutes lying on my back in the field, staring up at the sky. I only pried myself away to go to bed because it was freezing cold and at some point I needed to get some sleep. (Yes, sleeping in the field was an option, but there were cows, and cows, though they aren't very bright, are extremely curious. Imagine waking up at three a.m. to find a heifer nosing your forehead. One might never lie on one's back in a field again.)
I was back in the field the following morning for some walking meditation. I lay down on my back again, and my sweater rode up on my stomach. After a while I felt something walking around on me. I looked down (not very easy, with the breasts the size of Montana; I kind of had to flatten 'em and move them to one side) and beheld a very tiny grasshopper. It was maybe the size of my little fingernail, bright green, wide-eyed and moseying around on my stomach in a just-hatched sort of way.
"You might want to watch out," I told it. "I'm a mass murderer." (When I was a kid, grasshoppers infested the mint and asparagus plants in our backyard. I must have killed thousands of them. I've felt bad about this ever since.) The grasshopper did not seem alarmed. Neither did another one that hopped up next to the first one. So I shut my mouth and just watched them until they hopped off and disappeared into the grass.
I wonder if I've been forgiven.
Anyway, I had a pretty good time at the retreat, in case this isn't obvious. And I caught a stomach bug. Well, that wasn't so great, but I guess into every intestine a stomach bug must fall. Maybe it was the vegetarian food. I've always preferred they take it easy on the vegetarian.
Coincidentally, Joan and I are sneaking out of town this weekend for her birthday. We're going to Bonham, and that's not far from the retreat center. I've already emailed them to see if we can stop by and look at the stars. Answer: Yes.
Cool.
Friday, May 3, 2013
Off To Be The Wizard
I suck at this packing to leave town thing. I can't imagine it's anybody's favorite chore. I'm even reasonably good at the packing part; I can get a lot into a suitcase (thanks, Military Dad) but I still suck at it. Mainly I can't stop thinking about odds and ends I might need or could need or am thinking about possibly needing. Like a new pair of ear buds to replace the pair that broke yesterday. Like bug spray and some Power Bars and ear plugs for that hardy soul that gets to room with me. Mind you, I've already left the house, so all these things will need to be picked up from the drugstore. And a Starbucks, to get some Via in case they don't have coffee there. It's a Buddhist retreat; they'll probably only have tea. Coffee interferes with the blah blah blah and is bad for your ___________ and makes __________ more difficult or something like that. To which I say, blammo. Bring on the caffeine or I might get ugly. Er.
This place I'm going is in Oklahoma. Well, not quite Oklahoma. It's actually the border of Oklahoma, just south of the Red River. On Google Earth, anyway, you can see the river from there. Probably not in real life. It looks pretty darn rural, with fields and trees and rolling hills and stuff. Very intimidating for this child of technology.
Speaking of technology, this weekend is all about ditching it. There's no cell phone reception and no wi-fi. Which means no phone, no lights, no motor car, not a single luxury. Well, okay, I'm driving a motor car, so there must be SOME such things. And I've got a flashlight. There's probably electricity, at least for lights. But they're serious about no cell phones, no laptops, no tablets, no Internet, no Nooks, no...
Well, actually, I am taking my Nook.
But I can explain.
Our gang of Buddhists is reading a book called "Training In Compassion," by Norman Fischer. We're actually supposed to have read the whole thing, which I haven't done. I've read about half of it and understood basically none of it, but hopefully what I have absorbed will help some. We're all supposed to have a copy, and when I bought mine I did what I usually do. I bought it with my Nook. So there it is, on the Nook. And on my cell phone, which has a Nook app.
(In fact, in the ongoing war between Nooks and Kindles, I expect both to lose. Tablets will win and reign supreme, and Nook and Kindle apps will duke it out in cyberspace. But I still think Nooks should win just because they have a cooler name. Kindle. That's what you do to light a fire. Fire. Books. Bad combination.)
Apart from the Nook, though, which also has a bunch of religious texts, a couple of sci-fi thrillers, a trashy noir or two, the latest issue of Time Magazine and maybe, just maybe a cowboy romance (no, not really, but I scared you there, didn't I?), I'm going to unplug, put away and otherwise be shed of tech for two days. I think I can go that long without Tweeting. And if this thing lives up to its advertising, there won't be much to Tweet about anyway. Be safe, everybody. See you on the other side.
PS. Last night, in blasting wind and frigid temperatures, the mighty Law Dogs were brought low by Bat Pitch Crazy to the tune of 6-19. Yeah, that's pretty bad, but in the first inning we were ahead by two runs for the first time in team history. And yours truly managed two hits and runs to first without falling down. Truly, can the majors be far behind?
P.P.S. Big Country's new album "The Journey" is really really good!! Yes, even though Track Four is a heartbreaker and made me cry. Check it out. "The Journey," wherever classy CDs are sold.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Mini-Post: In a Big Country...
Yeah, yeah, I know I haven't done a blog post this week, but BIG COUNTRY TOTALLY HAS A NEW ALBUM COMING OUT ON TUESDAY, and what can I say, I've been a little distracted, it's only been like TWENTY YEARS since the last one, and yes, I know Stuart's dead, but Mike Peters is a good guy and he'll do a good job, okay? You can order it here. If you think Amazon is evil incarnate you can also get it here or here. Sorry about the CAPITAL LETTERS but I'm a LITTLE EXCITED. Caesar the Cat is not excited; he is asleep next to my keyboard. To be continued.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Retreat Retreat
I'm not even sure how long it's been since I did this, but in two weeks I'm going on a weekend meditation retreat. I think it may have been a couple of years, actually. I do recall I went with some folks from the Unity Church in Grapevine, which is hell and gone from Cartagenia, in a manner of speaking. It rained most of the weekend and opportunities to meditate outside were pretty much nonexistent. Plus my idiot neighbor (have I mentioned my idiot neighbor? He's an idiot) chose that weekend to chop down half of our live oak and demand payment for having done so, and I fielded a lot of frantic calls from Joan (understandably). Since then, I've done quite a few half-day retreats and I think a couple of full days, but nothing beyond that.
Devout Buddhists, by which I mean rich Buddhists, go on retreats a lot, and they go on much longer ones; a week, two weeks, even a month or more. Yes, it is technically possible to meditate ten hours a day for a month. Real Buddhist monks do it for years, sometimes their whole lives. But to go on retreats to meditate that much, you pretty much have to have money. Oh, no one's ever turned away from lack of funds, and all that, but even the Scholarship Rate can get pretty pricey. Take this one at the Shambhala Mountain Center, for example. Yeah, tuition's only $100 for an entire month, but lordy lordy, look at that room and boardy. $2,315.00 for a shared room. Same price for solitude in a tent. A tent. Scholarship rate, $1500. Okay, it's true that rent and food and everything else you need to live in the world probably costs that much or more, and if you spent that much for a week on a cruise ship you'd just be getting started, but you don't have to come up with it all at once, do you? Plus there's the getting there, and the incidentals, and the laundry, and the paying bills for the place you left behind (it's not like your landlord gives you a rent holiday or anything), and the sending postcards (I wonder if they let you send postcards).
Then there's the Retreats With Famous People, like this one. I, personally, have never heard of His Eminence Jigme Lodro Rinpoche Khandro Nyingtik, nor do I have any idea what the Heart Essence of the Dakinis is, but given the advertisement, I certainly should know, and I'd darned well better find out before I show up. Here's another one, and I've actually heard of Jack Kornfield. He's the author of The Wise Heart, which I've been trying to get through for a couple of years now. (It's full of lists. Buddha apparently liked making lists.) This one's nine days long, for a cost of between $1350 and $2110 depending on how comfortable you want to be. Kids, if I'm going to have my butt on a kapok-stuffed cushion for ten hours a day, I want to be as comfortable as possible. And there better be a swimming pool, too.
No, when it comes to retreats I'm kind of low-rent. I hang around with two different groups of Buddhists; the Maria Kannon group (all Zen, all the time) and the Dallas Meditation Center (Brother ChiSing's cult of personality and Tiep Hien - Order of Interbeing for those of you that don't speak Viet Namese, ie, practically everybody). Bet you didn't know Dallas had two gangs of Buddhists. How's this: There are actually more than a dozen. The DMC has a mini-retreat one Saturday morning every month, and I try never to miss one because by the time they roll around I'm usually in desperate need of some peace and quiet. The MKZC has zazenkai (day-long meditation) about once a month, and while I've thought many times about going, I've never actually managed it. Zen meditation is formal to the point of being scary and after about an hour I need a chair. What would they think if I dragged a chair in there? Terror of exclusion from the group; it's all very Japanese.
Well, there's one on the 27th and I might go. Maybe it would be a good warm-up. Until then, hoping for less rain and fewer altercations with my idiot neighbor. I did mention he's an idiot?
Devout Buddhists, by which I mean rich Buddhists, go on retreats a lot, and they go on much longer ones; a week, two weeks, even a month or more. Yes, it is technically possible to meditate ten hours a day for a month. Real Buddhist monks do it for years, sometimes their whole lives. But to go on retreats to meditate that much, you pretty much have to have money. Oh, no one's ever turned away from lack of funds, and all that, but even the Scholarship Rate can get pretty pricey. Take this one at the Shambhala Mountain Center, for example. Yeah, tuition's only $100 for an entire month, but lordy lordy, look at that room and boardy. $2,315.00 for a shared room. Same price for solitude in a tent. A tent. Scholarship rate, $1500. Okay, it's true that rent and food and everything else you need to live in the world probably costs that much or more, and if you spent that much for a week on a cruise ship you'd just be getting started, but you don't have to come up with it all at once, do you? Plus there's the getting there, and the incidentals, and the laundry, and the paying bills for the place you left behind (it's not like your landlord gives you a rent holiday or anything), and the sending postcards (I wonder if they let you send postcards).
Then there's the Retreats With Famous People, like this one. I, personally, have never heard of His Eminence Jigme Lodro Rinpoche Khandro Nyingtik, nor do I have any idea what the Heart Essence of the Dakinis is, but given the advertisement, I certainly should know, and I'd darned well better find out before I show up. Here's another one, and I've actually heard of Jack Kornfield. He's the author of The Wise Heart, which I've been trying to get through for a couple of years now. (It's full of lists. Buddha apparently liked making lists.) This one's nine days long, for a cost of between $1350 and $2110 depending on how comfortable you want to be. Kids, if I'm going to have my butt on a kapok-stuffed cushion for ten hours a day, I want to be as comfortable as possible. And there better be a swimming pool, too.
No, when it comes to retreats I'm kind of low-rent. I hang around with two different groups of Buddhists; the Maria Kannon group (all Zen, all the time) and the Dallas Meditation Center (Brother ChiSing's cult of personality and Tiep Hien - Order of Interbeing for those of you that don't speak Viet Namese, ie, practically everybody). Bet you didn't know Dallas had two gangs of Buddhists. How's this: There are actually more than a dozen. The DMC has a mini-retreat one Saturday morning every month, and I try never to miss one because by the time they roll around I'm usually in desperate need of some peace and quiet. The MKZC has zazenkai (day-long meditation) about once a month, and while I've thought many times about going, I've never actually managed it. Zen meditation is formal to the point of being scary and after about an hour I need a chair. What would they think if I dragged a chair in there? Terror of exclusion from the group; it's all very Japanese.
Well, there's one on the 27th and I might go. Maybe it would be a good warm-up. Until then, hoping for less rain and fewer altercations with my idiot neighbor. I did mention he's an idiot?
Saturday, April 13, 2013
We're Not In Kansas Anymore.
"Women do not lose their rights to medical decision making, bodily integrity and physical liberty upon becoming pregnant or at any stage of pregnancy, labor or delivery."
--Farah Diaz-Tello, attorney and advocate for pregnant women
" HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!"
--every male Republican politician in the United States
It was only a matter of time. History will record that on April 11, 2028, it officially became illegal to be in New York City while pregnant. New York City posted a PAH ratio (that's polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, for you science types) of 4.0 - almost double the 2.26 nanograms per cubic meter that's considered safe for human breathing. That's a measure of air pollution, and New York City's is one of the highest in the country. Since it's been proven that air pollution can negatively affect a child's IQ, and since pregnant women are criminally liable if they do anything during their pregnancies that might harm their babies, New York City is off limits to anyone who's more than two weeks late.
But New York wasn't the only city that closed its doors to pregnant women. Dallas, Fort Worth, Plano--pretty much the entire Metroplex and the quad-county area was off limits. San Francisco and San Diego were out. So was most of the Eastern seaboard. In fact, as the oil began to run out and more and more coal was trucked in to take its place, more and more cities went over the PAH ratio and more and more pregnant women were shipped to homes for expectant mothers in the Midwest. Kansas was a particular favorite And why not? It was a lot safer there. No ski resorts, no mountain climbing, no surfing, nothing dangerous to do during leisure time. Cigarettes were banned, alcohol consumption during pregnancy was already a class III misdemeanor, and though abortion was still technically legal, there were no providers in the state since the last clinic was run out of business by new regulations.
The Kansas homes were known for their fine security. Since that woman in Indiana ate rat poison to try to kill herself in her eighth month of pregnancy, many of the homes offer 24-hour "supervision" of all residents (they didn't like it if you called it "suicide watch"). Husband visits were encouraged, but only with a chaperon-no sex, of course; it might hurt the baby. By 2028, the biggest problem for the homes was keeping up with demand. With most forms of birth control banned on the theory that they "might" cause an abortion, and abortion still legal but for the most part unavailable, the average heterosexual female was having between five and six children, at least three of them unplanned. Some liberal feminists still complained that the new laws treated women like "walking wombs," but few paid attention. Most of the population agreed that if you were going to conceive a child, it was your duty to take care of it from the moment of conception to the moment of birth. What happened after that, of course, was somebody else's problem.
Okay, that's enough narrative. Now I'll tell you what in hell I'm talking about. I'm talking about this survey, which reviewed so-called "pro-life" laws in all 50 states and came up with 413 incidents in 44 states in which the laws were used not to help babies but to hurt women. Women have been on the receiving end of court orders, prosecutions, lawsuits and civil commitments that demand they put aside their own personal autonomy, their civil rights, their dignity and their personhood for the sake of the baby they're carrying.
Yeah. Personhood. Maybe you've heard that term before. You'll hear it again.
Think I'm hysterical? Thank you for that anti-woman sentiment (you did know that "hysterical" meant "a state of distress brought about by having a womb," didn't you?). Ponder these cases: A woman threatened with arrest because she wanted to have a c-section on Friday instead of Tuesday. A woman charged with attempted feticide for falling down a flight of stairs on the assumption she did it on purpose to kill her fetus. A woman in Idaho who was arrested for inducing her own abortion with RU-486, on the logic that somebody else can give you an abortion in Idaho, but you can't bring about your own. A woman in Indiana who, while severely mentally ill, tried to kill herself by eating rat poison. (Sorry, but this one just kills me.) She was eight months pregnant. She let some friends take her to a hospital, where she had an emergency C-section to get the baby out of harm's way. The baby died anyway. She was charged with murder and attempted feticide. The murder charge didn't stick but the attempted feticide charge did. You can follow the case here. It's unbelievable. Suicide is not against the law in Indiana. And if none of those make you think something's terribly wrong here, check this one out: A woman in Tennessee was arrested for child endangerment and driving while intoxicated, with no children in the car and with a blood alcohol level that was 0.04 - well below the legal limit of 0.08. Why? She admitted to having had a glass of wine and being pregnant.
I mean, I could go on. I have laws pending in Alabama and Tennessee that would make a fetus a "child" for reasons of "child abuse" once a fetal heartbeat is detected. I have a judge in Ohio that kept a woman in jail past her release date because he didn't want her to have an abortion. I have a woman in Oregon who was civilly committed to a psychiatric hospital because she refused to be tested for gestational diabetes. (Refusing a test, people. She was locked in a mental ward for refusing a test. In 2005.) But you get the idea. The idea is that somehow, legally, pregnant women form this whole underclass (like slaves, or gays, or 19th-century women) that has laws specifically applying to them that can apply to no one else.
So.
At what stage in pregnancy does a woman lose her civil rights?
More to the point, at what stage in pregnancy does a woman cease to be a person?
--Farah Diaz-Tello, attorney and advocate for pregnant women
" HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!"
--every male Republican politician in the United States
It was only a matter of time. History will record that on April 11, 2028, it officially became illegal to be in New York City while pregnant. New York City posted a PAH ratio (that's polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, for you science types) of 4.0 - almost double the 2.26 nanograms per cubic meter that's considered safe for human breathing. That's a measure of air pollution, and New York City's is one of the highest in the country. Since it's been proven that air pollution can negatively affect a child's IQ, and since pregnant women are criminally liable if they do anything during their pregnancies that might harm their babies, New York City is off limits to anyone who's more than two weeks late.
But New York wasn't the only city that closed its doors to pregnant women. Dallas, Fort Worth, Plano--pretty much the entire Metroplex and the quad-county area was off limits. San Francisco and San Diego were out. So was most of the Eastern seaboard. In fact, as the oil began to run out and more and more coal was trucked in to take its place, more and more cities went over the PAH ratio and more and more pregnant women were shipped to homes for expectant mothers in the Midwest. Kansas was a particular favorite And why not? It was a lot safer there. No ski resorts, no mountain climbing, no surfing, nothing dangerous to do during leisure time. Cigarettes were banned, alcohol consumption during pregnancy was already a class III misdemeanor, and though abortion was still technically legal, there were no providers in the state since the last clinic was run out of business by new regulations.
The Kansas homes were known for their fine security. Since that woman in Indiana ate rat poison to try to kill herself in her eighth month of pregnancy, many of the homes offer 24-hour "supervision" of all residents (they didn't like it if you called it "suicide watch"). Husband visits were encouraged, but only with a chaperon-no sex, of course; it might hurt the baby. By 2028, the biggest problem for the homes was keeping up with demand. With most forms of birth control banned on the theory that they "might" cause an abortion, and abortion still legal but for the most part unavailable, the average heterosexual female was having between five and six children, at least three of them unplanned. Some liberal feminists still complained that the new laws treated women like "walking wombs," but few paid attention. Most of the population agreed that if you were going to conceive a child, it was your duty to take care of it from the moment of conception to the moment of birth. What happened after that, of course, was somebody else's problem.
Okay, that's enough narrative. Now I'll tell you what in hell I'm talking about. I'm talking about this survey, which reviewed so-called "pro-life" laws in all 50 states and came up with 413 incidents in 44 states in which the laws were used not to help babies but to hurt women. Women have been on the receiving end of court orders, prosecutions, lawsuits and civil commitments that demand they put aside their own personal autonomy, their civil rights, their dignity and their personhood for the sake of the baby they're carrying.
Yeah. Personhood. Maybe you've heard that term before. You'll hear it again.
Think I'm hysterical? Thank you for that anti-woman sentiment (you did know that "hysterical" meant "a state of distress brought about by having a womb," didn't you?). Ponder these cases: A woman threatened with arrest because she wanted to have a c-section on Friday instead of Tuesday. A woman charged with attempted feticide for falling down a flight of stairs on the assumption she did it on purpose to kill her fetus. A woman in Idaho who was arrested for inducing her own abortion with RU-486, on the logic that somebody else can give you an abortion in Idaho, but you can't bring about your own. A woman in Indiana who, while severely mentally ill, tried to kill herself by eating rat poison. (Sorry, but this one just kills me.) She was eight months pregnant. She let some friends take her to a hospital, where she had an emergency C-section to get the baby out of harm's way. The baby died anyway. She was charged with murder and attempted feticide. The murder charge didn't stick but the attempted feticide charge did. You can follow the case here. It's unbelievable. Suicide is not against the law in Indiana. And if none of those make you think something's terribly wrong here, check this one out: A woman in Tennessee was arrested for child endangerment and driving while intoxicated, with no children in the car and with a blood alcohol level that was 0.04 - well below the legal limit of 0.08. Why? She admitted to having had a glass of wine and being pregnant.
I mean, I could go on. I have laws pending in Alabama and Tennessee that would make a fetus a "child" for reasons of "child abuse" once a fetal heartbeat is detected. I have a judge in Ohio that kept a woman in jail past her release date because he didn't want her to have an abortion. I have a woman in Oregon who was civilly committed to a psychiatric hospital because she refused to be tested for gestational diabetes. (Refusing a test, people. She was locked in a mental ward for refusing a test. In 2005.) But you get the idea. The idea is that somehow, legally, pregnant women form this whole underclass (like slaves, or gays, or 19th-century women) that has laws specifically applying to them that can apply to no one else.
- [N]or shall any person . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
--United States Constitution, 5th Amendment
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
--United States Constitution, 14th Amendment
So.
At what stage in pregnancy does a woman lose her civil rights?
More to the point, at what stage in pregnancy does a woman cease to be a person?
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Well:
There is a lot going on.
In fact, there's so much going on I'm not sure where to start. I guess I should start with apologizing for my conspicuous absence last week. I wrote this thing for this new writing group I'm in, see, and it came out sounding like a blog post. Coincidence? Probably. Anyway, I kept meaning to get back here and write a blog post, but it kind of never happened, and the writing group liked the piece, and did I mention I'm in a new writing group? Remind me to get back to that.
I guess I'll start with the Big News and wind my way down to the Lesser News. (Maybe we could call that the Children of a Lesser Blog, or something.) The first Item on the agenda is that we are no longer selling our house. That's right; we yanked it back off the market, troublesome sewer pipe and all. The reasons are many and varied, from the grim realization that it would probably cost us as much to move as it would to just fix the damn sewer pipe, to the Issues we were having with our real estate person. (I, as a general rule, do not do very well with real estate persons. Last time we did a transaction like this I fired three of them. I am not easy to put up with, either, and I know that, so I won't air the Real Estate Person Dirty Laundry in a semipublic forum. That would be Wrong. Doesn't mean I won't gossip about it shamelessly in a more private setting, however.)
Another one of the reasons was The Big Trial, which was supposed to start Monday. It was my first trial since I started with this firm (three years ago yesterday). As the trial date approached, I was getting more and more wound up. I mean out of all proportion to the actual situation, which was pretty good; we had a solid case, we were prepared, we thought we'd be able to pick a pretty good jury, etc. etc. Then one night I suddenly realized that I was having flashbacks to my last trial, which was an unmitigated disaster. It was for another firm in another world long ago in a galaxy far, far away, but, uh, it was pretty traumatic.
This dirty laundry, I can share in public. Most of it's public record anyway. To start with, it was a horrendous case. A commercial truck carrying a driver and two employees ran off the road and crashed when the driver fell asleep at the wheel. The driver lived, the other men died. Our client was the grown son of one of the men who died, and the other plaintiff was the widower of the other employee.
We had the company dead to rights, tho. There was a "smoking gun" memo from Personnel about how the driver was working too many hours. Why the case didn't settle long before trial, I have no idea, but two days before we started, the lawyer-in-charge suddenly decided he didn't want to try it. He handed it to his new junior associate who had been out of law school like a week and working for the firm for a day and a half. Our client didn't know New Guy and kept looking for the other lawyer, you know, the one he'd actually hired? (What a concept.) Once the trial started, New Guy basically let the defendants' lawyers pick the jury because he didn't know how. The widower's lawyer did his opening statement and when it came time for ours, New Guy leaned over and whispered, "I can't do it. I have stage fright."
Can we say, not a really good time to find this out?
So he stood up and waived our opening statement and our client looked at him like he had nine heads and things just deteriorated from there. Three days in, the company finally offered a settlement and we basically strongarmed our client into taking it. That was the worst part of all. Our client didn't really care about the money. What he wanted was to get up in front of a jury and tell his story, and we didn't let him. He went home with some money and boy was he ever pissed. And yes, I know none of this is really my fault, but I actually care about our clients and I actually want them to have a good outcome, and that one really got blown out of the water. I mean, the only thing that could have been worse is -- no, never say that. Anyway, it was bad. It was really, really bad. It was so bad I'd never even told Joan about it.
So I told Joan about it. And Joan began to explain why nothing like that could ever, ever ever happen with the firm I work for now. And she was, of course, right.
And then I felt better.
And then, out of nowhere, the other side in this trial we were going to have on Monday offered a settlement. And we took it. And our client's fine with it, so now there's no trial starting Monday. Which, by the way, is JUST FINE.
(I have another one in August.)
Let's see what else: I'm in a new writing group. Six of us meeting in a lady's private house in the White Rock Lake area. Our person-in-charge is a retired judge (!), and she's pretty sharp. She also has fish, and you've just got to love people who have fish. (I miss my fish.) The group's take on my mopey here's-where-I'm-at piece was that I need to quit whining and write another book, already. Yeah, working on that. Right after I finish digging up that sewer pipe.
I had to kill something this morning. (I hate killing things. It's un-Buddhist-y.) A wasp, or a couple of wasps, that were making a nest ON OUR FRONT DOOR. I thought we had an arrangement. They stayed away from the front of the house and I left them alone. I hope my sudden intervention with a rock won't shatter our truce, or I'll have to call Mikey, the exterminator. (Get Mikey. He kills everything.) That's right, I outsource my random acts of murder. Ask Joan how many six-legged flying cockroaches she's had to dispatch because I'm too afraid of them to catch them in a glass.
The mighty Law Dogs lost the last game 7 to 14. Still respectable. I got two hits, batted in three runners and made it to second base, prompting the usual assortment of bad jokes. And I did it all with a giant rip in the back of my pants. That's right, our legion of screaming fans (both of them) now know what color underwear I had on. Thanks, everybody, for letting me know five minutes before the game ended.
Tonight we got rained out. So technically we won, right?
One more thing -- R.I.P. Roger Ebert. You made us love the movies, even when they sucked. I will miss you on Twitter.
Later.
In fact, there's so much going on I'm not sure where to start. I guess I should start with apologizing for my conspicuous absence last week. I wrote this thing for this new writing group I'm in, see, and it came out sounding like a blog post. Coincidence? Probably. Anyway, I kept meaning to get back here and write a blog post, but it kind of never happened, and the writing group liked the piece, and did I mention I'm in a new writing group? Remind me to get back to that.
I guess I'll start with the Big News and wind my way down to the Lesser News. (Maybe we could call that the Children of a Lesser Blog, or something.) The first Item on the agenda is that we are no longer selling our house. That's right; we yanked it back off the market, troublesome sewer pipe and all. The reasons are many and varied, from the grim realization that it would probably cost us as much to move as it would to just fix the damn sewer pipe, to the Issues we were having with our real estate person. (I, as a general rule, do not do very well with real estate persons. Last time we did a transaction like this I fired three of them. I am not easy to put up with, either, and I know that, so I won't air the Real Estate Person Dirty Laundry in a semipublic forum. That would be Wrong. Doesn't mean I won't gossip about it shamelessly in a more private setting, however.)
Another one of the reasons was The Big Trial, which was supposed to start Monday. It was my first trial since I started with this firm (three years ago yesterday). As the trial date approached, I was getting more and more wound up. I mean out of all proportion to the actual situation, which was pretty good; we had a solid case, we were prepared, we thought we'd be able to pick a pretty good jury, etc. etc. Then one night I suddenly realized that I was having flashbacks to my last trial, which was an unmitigated disaster. It was for another firm in another world long ago in a galaxy far, far away, but, uh, it was pretty traumatic.
This dirty laundry, I can share in public. Most of it's public record anyway. To start with, it was a horrendous case. A commercial truck carrying a driver and two employees ran off the road and crashed when the driver fell asleep at the wheel. The driver lived, the other men died. Our client was the grown son of one of the men who died, and the other plaintiff was the widower of the other employee.
We had the company dead to rights, tho. There was a "smoking gun" memo from Personnel about how the driver was working too many hours. Why the case didn't settle long before trial, I have no idea, but two days before we started, the lawyer-in-charge suddenly decided he didn't want to try it. He handed it to his new junior associate who had been out of law school like a week and working for the firm for a day and a half. Our client didn't know New Guy and kept looking for the other lawyer, you know, the one he'd actually hired? (What a concept.) Once the trial started, New Guy basically let the defendants' lawyers pick the jury because he didn't know how. The widower's lawyer did his opening statement and when it came time for ours, New Guy leaned over and whispered, "I can't do it. I have stage fright."
Can we say, not a really good time to find this out?
So he stood up and waived our opening statement and our client looked at him like he had nine heads and things just deteriorated from there. Three days in, the company finally offered a settlement and we basically strongarmed our client into taking it. That was the worst part of all. Our client didn't really care about the money. What he wanted was to get up in front of a jury and tell his story, and we didn't let him. He went home with some money and boy was he ever pissed. And yes, I know none of this is really my fault, but I actually care about our clients and I actually want them to have a good outcome, and that one really got blown out of the water. I mean, the only thing that could have been worse is -- no, never say that. Anyway, it was bad. It was really, really bad. It was so bad I'd never even told Joan about it.
So I told Joan about it. And Joan began to explain why nothing like that could ever, ever ever happen with the firm I work for now. And she was, of course, right.
And then I felt better.
And then, out of nowhere, the other side in this trial we were going to have on Monday offered a settlement. And we took it. And our client's fine with it, so now there's no trial starting Monday. Which, by the way, is JUST FINE.
(I have another one in August.)
Let's see what else: I'm in a new writing group. Six of us meeting in a lady's private house in the White Rock Lake area. Our person-in-charge is a retired judge (!), and she's pretty sharp. She also has fish, and you've just got to love people who have fish. (I miss my fish.) The group's take on my mopey here's-where-I'm-at piece was that I need to quit whining and write another book, already. Yeah, working on that. Right after I finish digging up that sewer pipe.
I had to kill something this morning. (I hate killing things. It's un-Buddhist-y.) A wasp, or a couple of wasps, that were making a nest ON OUR FRONT DOOR. I thought we had an arrangement. They stayed away from the front of the house and I left them alone. I hope my sudden intervention with a rock won't shatter our truce, or I'll have to call Mikey, the exterminator. (Get Mikey. He kills everything.) That's right, I outsource my random acts of murder. Ask Joan how many six-legged flying cockroaches she's had to dispatch because I'm too afraid of them to catch them in a glass.
The mighty Law Dogs lost the last game 7 to 14. Still respectable. I got two hits, batted in three runners and made it to second base, prompting the usual assortment of bad jokes. And I did it all with a giant rip in the back of my pants. That's right, our legion of screaming fans (both of them) now know what color underwear I had on. Thanks, everybody, for letting me know five minutes before the game ended.
Tonight we got rained out. So technically we won, right?
One more thing -- R.I.P. Roger Ebert. You made us love the movies, even when they sucked. I will miss you on Twitter.
Later.
Labels:
Buddhism,
sports related thingys,
things legal,
work,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



